Engagement Ring and a Wedding Ring

People have used rings to express their love for one another for centuries. Over time, ring styles have evolved. Now, in many cultures, separate style rings are used to record different events. When the man proposes and when the couple marries are considered separate occasions. Each is marked by different rings. But what is the difference between a wedding ring and an engagement ring?

Traditionally, when a man proposes marriage to his fair maiden, he presents her with a valuable engagement ring. By wearing the ring, a woman expresses to others that she is “taken” and devoted to her future partner. Aside from celebrating the moment with the gift, the ring also symbolizes his commitment and could possibly help win the favor of the lady’s father.

The engagement ring is intended to be impressive, as it also a symbol of the would-be groom’s wealth. Therefore, it is often more decorative than a wedding band. It typically holds one or more gemstones, the most common of which is a diamond.

Wedding bands, on the other hand, are exchanged during the wedding ceremony. They usually are a matched pair, with the groom’s ring being thicker than the bride’s. The two wedding rings are generally less extravagant than the engagement ring and don’t have a central gemstone.

The materials used for both engagement and wedding rings are usually a precious metal such as gold, silver, or platinum. Sometimes, a woman’s engagement ring is bought as a set along with her wedding band. This is to ensure the two rings will match in style and have the proper fit. However, some women prefer to transfer the engagement ring to the right hand. Winnie Couture bridal collections can help you with your wedding plans and finding a dress that complements your ring styles. Both the engagement and wedding ring are a symbol of the commitment the couple share as partners. With all the variations in style, workmanship, and materials, you are sure to find the perfect combination to express your love.

The diamond is a tried-and-true classic when it comes to both wedding and engagement rings. The durability of the stone combined with its place in history makes a powerful statement when it comes to the sentimental nature of marriage. Couples can choose from a multitude of metals to nestle their stones in ranging from rose to white gold, and every selection allows the rings to be much like the partnership itself, unique and timeless.

Dating back during of ancient Rome, the exchange of rings, as well as a key, were a display of ownership. This custom was mostly tied to women and meant less about affection and more about possession. Not quite the lovey-dovey picture we have in our heads when we experience that moment for ourselves.

Dating back to the 1900s, the promise of a ring was seen as not only a promise of eternity but served as security to the bride. If the engagement was ever called off for any reason, the bride-to-be would develop a reputation. Therefore, she could sue her intended for damages.

Once the De Beers Group coined the term “A Diamond Is Forever” in the late 1940s, sales of the precious stone skyrocketed. Diamonds were synonymous with eternal love, and only diamonds were seen as engagement and wedding rings for decades.
With the dedication and commitment of holy matrimony also came flaws. More recently, it’s been brought to light that the way some diamonds are mined and sold in Africa has led to civil wars. While this has caused some couples to go the route of other stones for their ring, companies such as Brilliant Earth have brought awareness as well as conflict-free diamonds to market.

Through the sands of time, engagement and wedding rings have evolved tremendously in both sentiment and design. More variety may have been introduced as far as center stones, or even as accent pieces, but the diamond still remains the top dog throughout the wedding industry: true symbols of eternity.